Evolutionism Videos

Oh yes NephilimFree back for more humiliation... Let the fun begin. The videos being responded to in this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IsnlX-6YoBk A interesting article on Adam and Eve (Not my own and I am not in full agreement with it but vary interesting read) http://home.entouch.net/dmd/synop.htm Author: LittleTruckingBozo Keywords: Littletruckingbozo NephilimFree Reality Denialist Christian Christianity Bible God Jesus Christ Good Science Scientist Scientific Geology Cosmetology Astronomy Evolution Evolutionism Evolutionist Evo Creation Creationist Creationism Evil theist theism RE Fails yet again Part Added: October 22, 2009

There were a couple things I had to say to the new PCS after seeming to support his criticisms of Ida, the lemur-monkey link.

Author: AmbassadorOH Added: Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:54:02 -0800 Duration: 0Get the Book! http://tinyurl.com/mnboaz Get the Free PDF to this video http://tinyurl.com/m9cbpt Learn more about Creation and Evolutionism at http://www.ambassadorofheaven.org/creation.html

Get the Book! http://tinyurl.com/mnboaz Get the Free PDF to this video http://tinyurl.com/m9cbpt Learn more about Creation and Evolutionism at http://www.ambassadorofheaven.org/creation.html

Taking a look at how different societies are advancing at different rates on the same date in the distant past. I wrote the original script a couple years ago. http://darwinwasright.homestead.com/OneDayinArchaeology.html Although this is a bit different than anything Ive done lately, its something I wanted to do before moving on to anything else. I realize that showing actual archaeological artifacts and ancient ruins is unfortunately inevitably boring. So to keep the interest level at least as high as a documentary film strip shown in a classroom, Ive decided to use classic movie scenes, -specially selected and cleverly edited- to look like the things Im talking about. On all of my videos, people ask me where certain scenes came from. So Ive decided to list those references here: Conan the Barbarian (1982, Arnold Swartzenegger) Highlander (1986, Clancy Brown) Braveheart (1995, Mel Gibson) Hercules (1983, Lou Ferrigno) 10,000 BC (2008, Steven Strait) One Million B.C. (1940, Carole Landis) One Million Years BC (1966, Raquel Welch) Caveman (1981, Ringo Starr) Clan of the Cave Bear (1986, Daryl Hannah) Clash of the Titans (1981, Harry Hamlin) Quest for Fire (1981, Rae Dawn Chong) The New World (2005, Q'orianka Kilcher) The Golden Voyage of Sinbad (1974, Tom Baker) Apocolypto (2006, Rudy Youngblood) Lord of the Rings, Two Towers (2002, Andy Serkis) The Scorpion King (2002, The Rock) Akasha, Queen of the Damned (2002, Aaliyah) Life of Brian (1979, Monty Python) The Gods Must Be Crazy (1980, N!xau) Time Bandits (1981, Sean Connery) Monsters We Met (2003, documentary) Superbowl XLII commercial (2008, Bud Light)

http://www.AmbassadorOfHeaven.org When you think of an explosion, you see disaster! That is what happen during the time of the Big Bang, but how does the laws of the Universe form?

When Ray Comfort promised to prove the existence of God on national television, he knew he didnt have any evidence or proof to show. He just wanted was to preach his silly sermon on Nightline. Hes an attention whore, trying to look important by biting the ankle cuffs of the trousers of people far better than himself. Thats why he challenged Richard Dawkins to yet another display of Comforts own special brand of certifiable idiocy. If Dawkins agreed, then Comfort would pretend that his own insane ravings were somehow comparable to the consensus held by the worldwide scientific community. And if Dawkins refuses to offer airtime to somebody so obviously undeserving of it, then Comfort would pretend that Dawkins was afraid to debate him as if anyone should be afraid to debate Ray Comfort. So he gets free publicity either way. But Dawkins isnt an adequate or appropriate choice to debate Ray Comfort either. Dont get me wrong, I do respect Dr. Dawkins experience, his dedication and education in this area, but I just wanna bitch slap him every time he says that hes a Darwinist. People who understand the principles, practice and philosophy of science are not Darwinists. Weve come quite a way since the 19th century, thank you. Still Dawkins has a doctoral degree and decades of professorial experience teaching advanced scholars in some of the most prestigious in the US and the UK. Why should he waste his time giving airtime to an uneducated infomercial fraud who doesnt even know what evolution is? I think Comfort should debate someone with credentials equal to his own, and I believe I have found just the right person at the administrative office of our University of Texas. Unfortunately, hes still cleaning urinals in the mens room. So why not? Ill do it. I will challenge Ray Comfort to a debate. It will be an online debate, not a live one. Because in science accuracy matters more than the performance behind the podium. And whenever Comfort brings in his fudged figures, erroneous assertions of irrelevant nonsense, or out-of-context quote mining trying to argue from authority, I should have time enough to research and adequately expose every error he makes. Of course he has that same right to do that with me, although he wont find an opportunity and still wouldnt have the means if he could. So lets do it; lets have a dozen or so mutual exchanges opening with a three-and-a-half minute statement on one specific position, and keep our discussion focused only on that topic. Ill even let him choose what it is. We could talk about our taxonomic classification within primates, or the dozens of directly-observed and documented instances of macroevolution recorded in peer-reviewed journals, the hundreds of definite transitions unambiguously evident in the fossil record, or what distinguishes evolution from abiogenesis, or cosmology, or atheism, or religion; any of these things Comfort somehow still doesnt know dick about, Id be happy to teach him as long as its in a free and unrestricted venue where he wont be able to sell his books or videos to the losers in the lobby. Because Ill only allow him the kind of publicity hes earns for himself, and Ill only do that if I feel that he wont make a dime off me. Well let lawyers with the League of Reason work out any rules, and to determine the winner, well set up a voting system impervious to automated artifice, and of course well allow unrestricted discussion on all the boards of each video submitted. Because to do otherwise could only be an admission of cowardice implying an indefensibly dishonest position. When you wont let comments appear until or unless theyre approved, thats what it means! So what do you say? Because it wouldnt be possible for me to lose a debate against someone like you, and I think you and I both know there was never even one point you could argue in your favor that would ever turn out to be right.

A necessary commentary to follow the FFoC series, indicating the motivation behind it; and just in time for another assault against education launched by those elected to protect it. Heres the script: http://dogmaticagnostic.homestead.com/FFoC_epilogue.html There is also an unexpurgated version of this rant on Google video. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6783478269667280923&hl=en